11/10/2021, 12:10 AM
likewise we could consider trying to solve h(s) = s + 2 and hope " for the best " ; hoping it has none or not many solutions in the regions we care about.
or in general solving h(s) = s + n for integer n.
keep in mind that h(s) is suppose to be the closest solution to s.
SO if h(s) = s + 1 + 1/3 solves the issue , the other solution h(s) = s + 1 + 1 = s + 2 MIGHT not be a problem... so that still leaves hope.
the " MIGHT " part is due to analytic continuation/branches ; we want to consider the " same h(s) ".
regards
tommy1729
or in general solving h(s) = s + n for integer n.
keep in mind that h(s) is suppose to be the closest solution to s.
SO if h(s) = s + 1 + 1/3 solves the issue , the other solution h(s) = s + 1 + 1 = s + 2 MIGHT not be a problem... so that still leaves hope.
the " MIGHT " part is due to analytic continuation/branches ; we want to consider the " same h(s) ".
regards
tommy1729