Is this some kind of semi-direct product? Jesus; that would be cool...
Let me think on this... I'll see if I can think of anything.
Is \( g^\alpha \) really supposed to be an element of \( \text{Aut} \); rather than necessarily a conjugation?
........
Update:
So I'm not certain I can answer this; but, did you understand when I introduced the congruent integral (if you read the paper)? This is a different form of the compositional integral that is in a "modded out space". I can reduce (I think); your question into the abelian case; but I need to know how much of the congruent integral I should explain.
Also; what the solutions \( f \) are referred to as is homormorphisms of the semi-direct products between two groups.
In this case you are taking an inner automorphism \( g^{\alpha}\in \text{InnAut}(G) \subset \text{Aut}(G) \). Then you are constructing what is typically written,
\(
G \propto_{g^\alpha} N\\
\)
And you are looking for
\(
f : G \propto_{g^\alpha} N \to G
\)
There's a word for this; I can't remember it exactly.
Also, this forum doesn't have the best latex implementation; so \( \propto \) should actually be the symbol \( \rtimes \); which is more angular. It should look more like this![[Image: 8905]](https://charbase.com/images/glyph/8905)
.....
I'll explain this better tomorrow. Long night; but it's at least SOMETHING like this. Nonetheless; your answer lies in semi-direct products.
Let me think on this... I'll see if I can think of anything.
Is \( g^\alpha \) really supposed to be an element of \( \text{Aut} \); rather than necessarily a conjugation?
........
Update:
So I'm not certain I can answer this; but, did you understand when I introduced the congruent integral (if you read the paper)? This is a different form of the compositional integral that is in a "modded out space". I can reduce (I think); your question into the abelian case; but I need to know how much of the congruent integral I should explain.
Also; what the solutions \( f \) are referred to as is homormorphisms of the semi-direct products between two groups.
In this case you are taking an inner automorphism \( g^{\alpha}\in \text{InnAut}(G) \subset \text{Aut}(G) \). Then you are constructing what is typically written,
\(
G \propto_{g^\alpha} N\\
\)
And you are looking for
\(
f : G \propto_{g^\alpha} N \to G
\)
There's a word for this; I can't remember it exactly.
Also, this forum doesn't have the best latex implementation; so \( \propto \) should actually be the symbol \( \rtimes \); which is more angular. It should look more like this
.....
I'll explain this better tomorrow. Long night; but it's at least SOMETHING like this. Nonetheless; your answer lies in semi-direct products.

