05/19/2021, 12:25 AM
Thank you very much for these last posts. Only now it is starting to make sense and only now I can begin to appreciate version of the analogy you were proposing (in the light on the Jabotinsky connection of my last thread). One day I'll give you a worthy reply on this.
The answer is yes btw...
Yes... I was years ahead of myself and now you are able to read perfectly what I was driving at (mostly unconsciously) because you were already there.
The answer is yes btw...
Quote:The second analogy comes from something you're saying about superfunctions. Which I think might help. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think it might be what you are driving at
Yes... I was years ahead of myself and now you are able to read perfectly what I was driving at (mostly unconsciously) because you were already there.
Mother Law \(\sigma^+\circ 0=\sigma \circ \sigma^+ \)
\({\rm Grp}_{\rm pt} ({\rm RK}J,G)\cong \mathbb N{\rm Set}_{\rm pt} (J, \Sigma^G)\)