Set theory debate : cantor 1st / Virgil argument.
#2
By analogue we can show any open interval with endpoint 2 consecutive integers contains infinitely many fractions.

This SUGGESTS that there is no bijection from integers to fractions.
But there is.
This proof strategy fails.

Regards

Tommy1729
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Set theory debate : cantor 1st / Virgil argument. - by tommy1729 - 12/08/2015, 11:14 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  [UFO] "commutative number theory " f(g) = g(f) tommy1729 0 2,322 03/24/2023, 11:36 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  geometric function theory ideas tommy1729 0 2,878 12/31/2022, 12:19 AM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Trying to get Kneser from beta; the modular argument JmsNxn 2 4,632 03/29/2022, 06:34 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  " x-theory " tommy1729 1 3,921 08/12/2021, 12:17 AM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Dynamical Systems and Number Theory Daniel 4 9,352 06/01/2021, 11:34 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Is bounded tetration is analytic in the base argument? JmsNxn 0 5,606 01/02/2017, 06:38 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  [2015] Spiderweb theory tommy1729 0 6,096 03/29/2015, 06:25 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  [number theory] sieving with a_i mod p_i tommy1729 7 25,704 09/12/2014, 07:28 AM
Last Post: tommy1729
  " fake ring theory " tommy1729 0 6,113 06/11/2014, 11:29 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  [Number Theory] pi(X,x,x+2)+pi(X,x,x+4) tommy1729 1 7,872 04/11/2014, 10:33 PM
Last Post: tommy1729



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)