10/09/2015, 07:18 AM
I was thinking about g ' ' (h_n).
To avoid it being too small for the gaussian method , I invented the Tommy-Sheldon iterations.
However perhaps computing a fake g works better.
Although computing a fake g with the gaussian could result in " the same problem with g_2 ".
( the Tommy-Sheldon iterations do not have that problem )
Or maybe combining those.
Hmm.
Regards
Tommy1729
To avoid it being too small for the gaussian method , I invented the Tommy-Sheldon iterations.
However perhaps computing a fake g works better.
Although computing a fake g with the gaussian could result in " the same problem with g_2 ".
( the Tommy-Sheldon iterations do not have that problem )
Or maybe combining those.
Hmm.
Regards
Tommy1729
