Maybe the fact that prod (sin^2(n) - 25/16) stays bounded and diverges has something to do with this.
This suggests that Maybe we should replace s with similar to make things nicer.
Im also unsure about that integral ... Maybe the values of F are too close to 0 most of the time.
I think with strong hesitation that for large n with respect to x ,
The function F Goes to exp(-2n ln(n) + 2n) prod gamma(p_n)^(2/p_n) asymptotically with measure 1. This estimate is based on statistical thinking and prod p_n ~ exp(n ln n - n).
This estimate hints at correcting factors for the integrand also known as weights.
Atthough all this suggests we are not talking of the simplest or best sieve type function , it is intuïtive and therefore intresting.
A lot of work to do but lots of inspiration.
The way i like math usually.
Regards
Tommy1729
This suggests that Maybe we should replace s with similar to make things nicer.
Im also unsure about that integral ... Maybe the values of F are too close to 0 most of the time.
I think with strong hesitation that for large n with respect to x ,
The function F Goes to exp(-2n ln(n) + 2n) prod gamma(p_n)^(2/p_n) asymptotically with measure 1. This estimate is based on statistical thinking and prod p_n ~ exp(n ln n - n).
This estimate hints at correcting factors for the integrand also known as weights.
Atthough all this suggests we are not talking of the simplest or best sieve type function , it is intuïtive and therefore intresting.
A lot of work to do but lots of inspiration.
The way i like math usually.
Regards
Tommy1729
