Why bases 0<a<1 don't get love on the forum?
#16
What is the justification to demand that the derivative at zero must be zero?

Every time I tried to develop a Taylor series of tetration, I found that there is ever a degree of liberty, in choosing the derivative at 0.

This was part of one of my failed attempts.

marraco Wrote:Let suppose that there exist a series for \( \\[15pt]

{^xa} \) convergent in a radius equal or larger than 1.

Since °a=1, the first coefficient must be a₀=1:

\( ^xa \,=\, 1 \,+\, \sum _{n=1}^{\infty } a_n
. x^n \)


Let's call p to the sum of even terms, and q to the sum of odd ones
\( p \,=\, \sum _{n=even}^{\infty }
a_n \\
\\
\\
q \,=\, \sum _{n=odd}^{\infty }
a_n \)


Since we know the values of \( \\[15pt]

{^xa} \) at -1 and 1:
\(
\left.\begin{matrix}\\
\\[15pt]

{^1a=a}
\,\,\,&\Rightarrow\,\,\,
\sum _{n=0}^{\infty } a_n=a

\,\,\,&\Rightarrow\,\,\,
p+q=a
\\
\\
\\[15pt]

{^{-1}a=0}
\,\,\,&\Rightarrow\,\,\,
1+\sum _{n=1}^{\infty } (-1)^n a_n=0
\,\,\,&\Rightarrow\,\,\,
p-q=0
\end{matrix}\right\}
\Rightarrow
\left\{\begin{matrix}
p=\frac{a}{2}
\\
\\
q=\frac{a}{2}
\end{matrix}\right.
\)

If we need to make a linear systems of equations to solve the coefficients, this would be the first one.


Looking at the series, is evident that the functions generated by the coefficients p, P(x) and q, Q(x) would be calculable from \( \\[15pt]

{^xa} \) this way:

\( {\\[15pt]

{\color{Red} P}} \)\(
(x) \,=\,
1+\sum _{n=1}^{\infty } a_{2n} \,.\, x^{2n}\,=\,
\frac{^xa \,+\,{^{-x}a}}{2}
\)

\( {\\[15pt]

{\color{Green} Q}} \)\(
(x) \,=\,
\sum _{n=0}^{\infty } a_{1+2n} \,.\, x^{1+2n}\,=\,
\frac{^xa\,-\,{^{-x}a}}{2}
\)

Those functions may be related to an analogous decomposition of e^x into sines and cosines.
[Image: x8RXtVL.png?1]
[Image: 54RSKT9.png?1]
[Image: wgtELKc.png?1]

We also know this differential equation:

\( \frac{\mathrm{d} ^xa}{\mathrm{d} x} \,=\, ln(a)\,.\,^xa\,.\,\frac{\mathrm{d} (^{x-1}a)}{\mathrm{d} x} \)

The derivative at 0 is \( \\[15pt]

{D_0^1=a_1} \)

Then:

\( \left.\begin{matrix}\\
\\[15pt]

{D_0^1\,=\,ln(a).\,^0a.D_{-1}^1}
\\
D_{x}^1 \,=\,
\sum _{n=1}^{\infty } n.a_n.
x^{n-1}
\,=\,\dot{P}+\dot{Q}

\end{matrix}\right\}

\,\,a_1\,=\,
ln(a)\,.\, \sum _{n=1}^{\infty } n.a_n. (-1)^{n-1}
\,=\,
ln(a)\,.\, ( \dot{P}_{-1}+\dot{Q}_{-1})
\)

The derivative at x=1 is


\(
\\[15pt]

{\dot{P}_1+\dot{Q}_1 \,=\,
ln(a).\,^1a.D_{0}^1 \,=\,
ln(a).\,a.\,a_1
}
\)

But, P series only has even powers of x, and Q only odd, so:
\( \\[15pt]

{
\dot{P}_{-1}\,=\,-\dot{P}_{1}
\\
\dot{Q}_{-1}\,=\,\dot{Q}_{1}
} \)

Then

\( \\[15pt]


{ \frac{1}{ln(a)} \,.\, a_1 \,+\,
( \dot{P}_{1}-\dot{Q}_{1})
\,=\, 0
\\
ln(a^{-a}) .\,a_1 \,+\, \dot{P}_1+\dot{Q}_1
\,=\, 0
}
\)
Which is a system of 2 equations with 3 unknown. If I try to add anything else, I ever get one extra unknown.
Reply


Messages In This Thread

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  A very special set of tetration bases marcokrt 3 6,494 03/14/2026, 01:43 PM
Last Post: marcokrt
  Tetration with complex bases TetrationSheep 0 958 11/13/2025, 10:33 AM
Last Post: TetrationSheep
Question Convergent Complex Tetration Bases With the Most and Least Imaginary Parts Catullus 0 2,952 07/10/2022, 06:22 AM
Last Post: Catullus
  Tetration extension for bases between 1 and eta dantheman163 23 67,217 07/05/2022, 04:10 PM
Last Post: Leo.W
  Has this tetration been considered before in the forum? MphLee 5 8,723 11/05/2021, 05:12 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  I'm back on tetration forum sheldonison 6 9,456 09/25/2021, 04:13 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Bundle equations for bases > 2 tommy1729 0 6,324 04/18/2015, 12:24 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Alternate solution of tetration for "convergent" bases discovered mike3 12 45,707 09/15/2010, 02:18 AM
Last Post: mike3
  my accepted bases tommy1729 0 6,167 08/29/2010, 07:38 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  [Regular tetration] bases arbitrarily near eta Gottfried 0 6,852 08/22/2010, 09:01 AM
Last Post: Gottfried



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)