Real-analytic tetration uniqueness criterion?
#10
(06/09/2014, 12:20 PM)mike3 Wrote: IMPORTANT!

I just was running some more tests and I've discovered that these results may not be trustworthy. Apparently, increasing the precision on sheldonison's Kneser PARI/GP program does not seem to make it necessarily generate more than 64 digits of the tetrational. So results requiring high precision seem to be suspect. I'll need to figure out how to get more digits out of the code before trying again. I had done a "\p 128" and it only would display 64 digits -- upon "\p 128"ing again to force it to cough up more digits, I found all the succeeding digits after the initial 64 were different from those I got for "\p 256", suggesting it is not getting beyond 64 digits.

I'm not sure how to get the program to give a correct result with more than 64 digits -- sheldonison?

Hey Mike,

After changing the precision with "\p 134" or any large number, type in
"init(exp(1));" You will get approximately n/2 decimal digits for the results, limited by the Schroeder functions algorithm.
Code:
\p 134
init(exp(1));

This regenerates the tetration system with arbitrarily high precision numbers. The "init(exp(1));" after the default of "\p 67" takes 3 or 4 seconds. After "\p 134" takes about 30 seconds, and after "\p 221" takes 3-4 minutes. There s an out of memory (>4meg) error around "\p 230" or so. But I have used "\p 512" I think with 30 minutes computer time. The out of memory error is due to initializing my base eta approximation function, in the initcheta code. Here is a patch to remove that memory error.
Code:
initcheta() = {
/* automatically initialize cheta during program initialization */
  local(z,local);
  z=1.0;
  precis=precision(z);
  /* initialization for xcheta and xsexpeta required for cheta, sexpeta, invcheta, invsexpeta functions */
  /* initalizes to match precis, 50 digits/67 digits, this routine aims for 75% precision               */
  /* called from init(initbase) when program is loaded, and when init detects the precision has changed */
  if (precis<=180,
    chterms   = 2*(floor(precis/2)-8)+1;
,
    chterms   = 2*(floor(180/2)-8)+1;
);
  chdelta   = (chterms-1)*2;
  xcheta = genpoly(chterms,chdelta,0);
  invchetr = imag(cheta(-chdelta+(chterms-1)*I/2));
  invprecis = 10000.*(10^-chterms);
  /* invprecis = 100*abs(chetaerr(I+0.5,chdelta)); */
  /* invprecis = 1E-47; */
  chetadlt=cheta(-chdelta);
  xsexpeta = genpoly(chterms,chdelta,1);
  sxpetadlt=sexpeta(chdelta);
  return(0);
}
- Sheldon
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Real-analytic tetration uniqueness criterion? - by sheldonison - 06/09/2014, 01:16 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  extending normal tetration to real numbers using product tetration Alex Zuma 2025 0 951 12/12/2025, 07:49 PM
Last Post: Alex Zuma 2025
  my proposed extension of the fast growing hierarchy to real numbers Alex Zuma 2025 0 1,346 09/28/2025, 07:15 PM
Last Post: Alex Zuma 2025
  Behaviour of tetration into the real negatives Shanghai46 1 6,411 03/24/2025, 12:34 AM
Last Post: MphLee
  X-th iteration where x is a real number Natsugou 1 5,732 10/27/2024, 11:23 PM
Last Post: MphLee
  Real tetration as a limit of complex tetration Daniel 5 9,579 06/20/2023, 07:52 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Real and complex tetration Daniel 13 17,364 04/04/2023, 10:25 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  double functional equation , continuum sum and analytic continuation tommy1729 6 9,811 03/05/2023, 12:36 AM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Iteration with two analytic fixed points bo198214 62 73,373 11/27/2022, 06:53 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Range of complex tetration as real Daniel 2 4,995 10/22/2022, 08:08 PM
Last Post: Shanghai46
  From complex to real tetration Daniel 3 6,357 10/21/2022, 07:55 PM
Last Post: Daniel



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)