05/29/2014, 11:32 PM
Thanks for the post sheldon.
My intuition gave me similar ideas , but even my own motivations are not clear to me.
I am both gratefull for your posts but at the same time expected more theoretical motivation.
Well it gets pretty complicated thats almost certain.
I call this " fake function theory " invented by tommy and sheldon
afterall this is getting " bigger " than a 101 calculus textbook.
I like the name " fake function theory " , sounds exciting and not dull or is it just me.
The fact that the name does not reveal what it is immediately might be part of the attraction. Also the " fake " sounds like sherlock thing.
Lots of work left to do.
regards
tommy1729
My intuition gave me similar ideas , but even my own motivations are not clear to me.
I am both gratefull for your posts but at the same time expected more theoretical motivation.
Well it gets pretty complicated thats almost certain.
I call this " fake function theory " invented by tommy and sheldon

afterall this is getting " bigger " than a 101 calculus textbook.
I like the name " fake function theory " , sounds exciting and not dull or is it just me.
The fact that the name does not reveal what it is immediately might be part of the attraction. Also the " fake " sounds like sherlock thing.
Lots of work left to do.
regards
tommy1729

