04/03/2013, 10:01 PM
Apparantly my friend mick posted a more formal (and slightly stronger) version of this question to MSE.
http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/...with-f-0-2
However it is not very popular and it even got closed.
On the other hand it also got votes to be reopened and I think his table is correct.
Perhaps my OP here was to vague and some of you might benefit from the post by mick.
To see the link notice that ln(x) + ln^[2](x)+... is close to arcsinh(x/2) + archsinh... because ln(x) is close to arcsinh(x/2).
***
I must say im not surprised that it got closed, but not for the right reasons imho.
The attitude towards tetration and some parts of dynamical systems is unacceptable and prehistoric imho.
This imho fact is one of the reasons i came to the tetration forum. But i guess i should stop talking now because im getting emotional.
However I guess some ppl including mick, lwalke3, john97, bill dubuque, timothy golden, quasi, galathaea, jasper74 and many more ( including some members here and ppl who insisted me to (*) ) understand why I did not become a member of /or removed my membership of/ some chat/Q&A/math sites.
I know im not the first to complain about this type of behaviour towards tetration and those posting about it , but anno 2013 the situation has not improved much although dynamical systems has gained popularity.
(* clear from context)
regards
tommy1729
http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/...with-f-0-2
However it is not very popular and it even got closed.
On the other hand it also got votes to be reopened and I think his table is correct.
Perhaps my OP here was to vague and some of you might benefit from the post by mick.
To see the link notice that ln(x) + ln^[2](x)+... is close to arcsinh(x/2) + archsinh... because ln(x) is close to arcsinh(x/2).
***
I must say im not surprised that it got closed, but not for the right reasons imho.
The attitude towards tetration and some parts of dynamical systems is unacceptable and prehistoric imho.
This imho fact is one of the reasons i came to the tetration forum. But i guess i should stop talking now because im getting emotional.
However I guess some ppl including mick, lwalke3, john97, bill dubuque, timothy golden, quasi, galathaea, jasper74 and many more ( including some members here and ppl who insisted me to (*) ) understand why I did not become a member of /or removed my membership of/ some chat/Q&A/math sites.
I know im not the first to complain about this type of behaviour towards tetration and those posting about it , but anno 2013 the situation has not improved much although dynamical systems has gained popularity.
(* clear from context)
regards
tommy1729
