imho a core issue
#3
(12/20/2011, 09:23 AM)sheldonison Wrote: ... or in the case of tommysexp, \( \text{tommysexp}(z)=\lim_{n\to\infty} \log^{[n]}\text{superfunction2sinh}(z+n+k) \). I focused on cheta, the upper superexponential for base eta=exp(1/e), which is used for the base change sexp function, but it turns out, that iterated logarithms for cheta for n+2 logarithms behaves similar to iterated logarithms for tommysexp for n logarithms. I have some vacation time, so I will try and post the results later.
- Sheldon

So Sheldon , did you find time to compute the results ?
Guess im a bit impatient , but i expected them sooner since you mentioned vacation time.

and i guess im not alone, considering this has about 100 views for only 2 posts.

i understand that the computations might not be so simple as they might appear at first sight as you or someone else assumed... ( not a guess but the actual numbers up to some roundoff )

i also want to point out again that my method of computation is somewhat different and might even be distinct at some places.

tommy1729
Reply


Messages In This Thread
imho a core issue - by tommy1729 - 12/16/2011, 08:51 PM
RE: imho a core issue - by sheldonison - 12/20/2011, 09:23 AM
RE: imho a core issue - by tommy1729 - 01/04/2012, 07:06 PM
RE: imho a core issue - by sheldonison - 01/07/2012, 12:51 AM
RE: imho a core issue - by tommy1729 - 01/07/2012, 06:28 PM
RE: imho a core issue - by sheldonison - 01/08/2012, 02:54 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  [2014] The secondary fixpoint issue. tommy1729 2 11,798 06/15/2014, 08:17 PM
Last Post: tommy1729



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)