06/05/2011, 01:45 PM
(03/03/2009, 12:15 PM)Gottfried Wrote: serial summation
0.709801988103 towards 2'nd fixpoint: \( \sum_{h=0}^{\infty} (-1)^h * f^{\circ h}(1.0) \)
0.419756033790 towards 1'st fixpoint: \( \sum_{h=0}^{\infty} (-1)^h * f^{\circ -h}(1.0) \)
Matrix-method:
0.580243966210 towards 2'nd fixpoint // incorrect, doesn't match serial summation
0.419756033790 towards 1'st fixpoint // matches serial summation
a reason might be this : the vandermonde matrix must have a determinant <> 1 for almost all functions.
hence the determinant of f^h(x) and f^-h(x) cannot both satisfy to be in the radius ( determinant < 1 = within radius 1 ) for (1 - A)^-1.
basicly just taylor series radius argument for matrices.
have you considered this ?
if i am correct about that , the question becomes : what if the determinant of f(x) is 1 ? will the matrix method agree on both fixpoints ?

