03/16/2011, 12:04 AM
seems my quote was not relevant.
i dont know what you mean by x {y} z then.
with respect , but i find it confusingly explained.
first it was a mean , now its a kind of tetration ?
it wasnt the limiting mean i quoted , so what is it ?
perhaps define
x {y} z = ... with real math symbols instead of pseudocode.
i cannot discuss things i do not understand.
i dont know what you mean by x {y} z then.
with respect , but i find it confusingly explained.
first it was a mean , now its a kind of tetration ?
it wasnt the limiting mean i quoted , so what is it ?
perhaps define
x {y} z = ... with real math symbols instead of pseudocode.
i cannot discuss things i do not understand.
