Improving convergence of Andrew's slog
#15
(09/28/2007, 03:31 AM)jaydfox Wrote: In order to improve convergence, what I've done is taken the coefficients for the two known singularities at 0.31813... + 1.3372357i and its conjugate, and put them in the B vector, rather than 0's. These coefficients aren't the true values from A, but they're much, much, much closer to the true values. This reduces the errors in the final solution by several orders of magnitude.

Does anybody know what JayD meant here with "coefficients for the two known singularities", and how he arranges them and their conjugates in the B vector?
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Improving convergence of Andrew's slog - by bo198214 - 06/26/2010, 11:54 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Revisting my accelerated slog solution using Abel matrix inversion jaydfox 22 76,778 05/16/2021, 11:51 AM
Last Post: Gottfried
  sum(e - eta^^k): convergence or divergence? Gottfried 6 27,039 08/17/2010, 11:05 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  A note on computation of the slog Gottfried 6 28,752 07/12/2010, 10:24 AM
Last Post: Gottfried
  intuitive slog base sqrt(2) developed between 2 and 4 bo198214 1 10,900 09/10/2009, 06:47 PM
Last Post: bo198214
  sexp and slog at a microcalculator Kouznetsov 0 7,924 01/08/2009, 08:51 AM
Last Post: Kouznetsov
  Convergence of matrix solution for base e jaydfox 6 25,764 12/18/2007, 12:14 AM
Last Post: jaydfox
  SAGE code implementing slog with acceleration jaydfox 4 18,836 10/22/2007, 12:59 AM
Last Post: jaydfox
  Dissecting Andrew's slog solution jaydfox 15 49,184 09/20/2007, 05:53 AM
Last Post: jaydfox
  Computing Andrew's slog solution jaydfox 16 52,607 09/20/2007, 03:53 AM
Last Post: andydude



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)