Dissecting Andrew's slog solution
#15
jaydfox Wrote:The main reason for iterating 0 rather than 1 is because the radius of convergence of Andrew's slog limits me to this range. (The radius of convergence is limited by the singularity at the fixed point.)

Oh this is interesting. It is known that a regular iteration at a hyperbolic fixed point has no singularity at this fixed point. But the regular iterations are complex valued (not real for real argument, forget what I wrote about it elsewhere) and hence not equal to any real solution.
So any real solution must have singularities at the non-real fixed points (which are always hyperbolic).
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Dissecting Andrew's slog solution - by jaydfox - 08/28/2007, 07:23 AM
RE: Dissecting Andrew's slog solution - by bo198214 - 09/11/2007, 06:33 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Revisting my accelerated slog solution using Abel matrix inversion jaydfox 22 74,764 05/16/2021, 11:51 AM
Last Post: Gottfried
  A note on computation of the slog Gottfried 6 27,863 07/12/2010, 10:24 AM
Last Post: Gottfried
  Improving convergence of Andrew's slog jaydfox 19 71,536 07/02/2010, 06:59 AM
Last Post: bo198214
  intuitive slog base sqrt(2) developed between 2 and 4 bo198214 1 10,649 09/10/2009, 06:47 PM
Last Post: bo198214
  sexp and slog at a microcalculator Kouznetsov 0 7,731 01/08/2009, 08:51 AM
Last Post: Kouznetsov
  Convergence of matrix solution for base e jaydfox 6 24,873 12/18/2007, 12:14 AM
Last Post: jaydfox
  SAGE code implementing slog with acceleration jaydfox 4 18,306 10/22/2007, 12:59 AM
Last Post: jaydfox
  Computing Andrew's slog solution jaydfox 16 51,023 09/20/2007, 03:53 AM
Last Post: andydude



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)