Operations with fractional index between + and * ?
#6
Just had another thought on this matter.

In order for this interpolation to work, you should also check to see if it applies for ranks above 3, for example (to use a combination Knuth-Bromer-Mueller arrow system), we have the first 5 lower hyperoperations are: \( \{a + b, ab, a{\uparrow}b, a{\downarrow}{\uparrow}b, a{\downarrow}{\downarrow}{\uparrow}b\} \), and so we should check that:
\( \mathcal{S}[{\downarrow}{\uparrow}b](x) = \log_a(\log_a(x)) \), and
\( \mathcal{S}[{\downarrow}{\downarrow}{\uparrow}b](x) = \log_a(\log_a(\log_a(x))) \)
and I have a feeling that this is not the case.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Operations with fractional index between + and * ? - by andydude - 10/20/2009, 08:42 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
Question Base Pi Hyper-Operations Catullus 3 9,064 11/08/2022, 06:51 AM
Last Post: Catullus
Question Rank-Wise Approximations of Hyper-Operations Catullus 48 84,277 09/08/2022, 02:52 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
Question Octonion Hyper-Operations Catullus 3 7,832 07/05/2022, 08:53 AM
Last Post: Catullus
  Thoughts on hyper-operations of rational but non-integer orders? VSO 4 16,214 06/30/2022, 11:41 PM
Last Post: MphLee
  On my old fractional calculus approach to hyper-operations JmsNxn 14 30,759 07/07/2021, 07:35 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  On to C^\infty--and attempts at C^\infty hyper-operations JmsNxn 11 26,003 03/02/2021, 09:55 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Could there be an "arctic geometry" by raising the rank of all operations? Syzithryx 2 11,399 07/24/2019, 05:59 PM
Last Post: Syzithryx
  on constructing hyper operations for bases > eta JmsNxn 1 10,281 04/08/2015, 09:18 PM
Last Post: marraco
  Theorem in fractional calculus needed for hyperoperators JmsNxn 5 23,842 07/07/2014, 06:47 PM
Last Post: MphLee
  Negative, Fractional, and Complex Hyperoperations KingDevyn 2 20,277 05/30/2014, 08:19 AM
Last Post: MphLee



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)