A false interpolation paradigm (?); a reconsideration
#2
The interpolation you describe is what Ansus also uses as Newton/Lagrange interpolation. (The interpolation polynomial is uniquely determined whether you use Newton or Lagrange formula or calculate it directly as solving the matrix equation like you do.)

I showed that this is interpolation (which only works for b<=e^(1/e)) is equivalent to the regular iteration at the lower (attracting) fixed point.

In so far the interpolation is "correct".

There are two problems that occur in your description with the logarithm.
1. the logarithm has no powerseries at 0 (perhaps better try to interpolate log(x+1))
2. the interpolation method seems only to converge if \( f^{[n]} \) tends to a limit. Which the logarithm does not satisfy.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: A false interpolation paradigm (?); a reconsideration - by bo198214 - 09/16/2009, 11:32 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  A related discussion on interpolation: factorial and gamma-function Gottfried 9 30,444 07/10/2022, 06:23 AM
Last Post: Gottfried
  My interpolation method [2020] tommy1729 1 6,528 02/20/2020, 08:40 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Tribonacci interpolation ? tommy1729 0 6,028 09/08/2014, 10:37 AM
Last Post: tommy1729
  [Update] Comparision of 5 methods of interpolation to continuous tetration Gottfried 30 96,456 02/04/2014, 12:31 AM
Last Post: Gottfried
  True or False Logarithm bo198214 4 22,231 04/25/2012, 09:37 PM
Last Post: andydude
  Self tetraroot constructed via Newton series interpolation mike3 2 15,400 07/11/2010, 03:38 AM
Last Post: mike3
  exponential polynomial interpolation Gottfried 3 16,581 07/16/2008, 10:32 PM
Last Post: andydude
  polynomial interpolation to fractional iteration Gottfried 3 17,563 12/23/2007, 03:40 PM
Last Post: Gottfried



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)