Solving tetration for base 0 < b < e^-e
#11
(09/12/2009, 09:04 PM)mike3 Wrote: So then since neither of those worked, it seems all we're left with is the Ansus formula and the Cauchy integral (but determining the correct contours and asymptotic behavior, now that's the rub...).

I'm also curious: What about \( b = e^{-e} \) exactly? You said it converges slowly, but how do you iterate it at all? What is the asymptotic as the tower \( x \rightarrow \infty \)?

I used a complex fixpoint and could generate the matrices for regular iteration (in context of diagonalization). The fixpoint I used is
t0 = -0.1957457524880764 - 1.691199920910569*I
one of its logarithms is
u0 = 0.5320921219863799 + 4.597158013302573*I
where u0 = log(t0) + 2*Pi*I // log giving the principal branch
With this I create the triangular Bell-matrix and diagonalize.

The series has complex terms and is very difficult to evaluate - I accelerate slow converging series usually with Euler-summation, but the series has complex terms and it seems I need also complex order for Euler-summation. With 128 terms I could at least get results which reproduced the integer iteration to such an approximate that I'm confident that the series can be used in principle.
However, the fractional iterates behave even worse, and two half-iterates reproduce the integer iterate just to two decimals... Sad

The schröder-term s for schr(x') and x'=x/t0 - 1 at x=1 is, according to the last three partial sums of the series (128 terms):
Code:
[126]  -0.4119542792176348+1.439754774257274*I
[127]  -0.4119542792176264+1.439754774257268*I
[128]  -0.4119542792176181+1.439754774257268*I
...
where I assume s~ -0.411954279217... +1.439754774257...*I as correct decimals.
From here we can compute y' = schr°-1(s * u0^h ) and with h=1 I reproduce exp_b°1(1) = b =exp(-exp(1)) to 15 digits exact.
The last three partial sums of the series:
Code:
´
[126]   -1.004456441437337+0.03850266639539727*I
[127]   -1.004456441437337+0.03850266639539727*I
[128]   -1.004456441437337+0.03850266639539727*I
...
From here y' = -1.004456441437337+0.03850266639539727*I, y=(y'+1)*t0 , y-b = -7.405812 E-17 + 2.57894 E-15*I is an acceptable approximation. However - it is only the integer-iteration. I've not yet found en Euler-order or another convergence acceleration which stabilizes the partial sums for the half-iterate to an acceptable degree.

Gottfried
Gottfried Helms, Kassel
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Solving tetration for base 0 < b < e^-e - by Gottfried - 09/13/2009, 06:14 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  [2sinh] exp(x) - exp( - (e-1) x), Low Base Constant (LBC) 1.5056377.. tommy1729 3 5,832 04/30/2023, 01:22 AM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Base -1 marraco 15 37,117 07/06/2022, 09:37 AM
Last Post: Catullus
  I thought I'd take a crack at base = 1/2 JmsNxn 9 13,498 06/20/2022, 08:28 AM
Last Post: Catullus
  solving f(g(x)) = f(x) converging to f(exp(x)) = f(x) tommy1729 2 4,330 05/26/2022, 11:07 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
Big Grin Repetition of the last digits of a tetration of generic base Luknik 12 19,594 12/16/2021, 12:26 AM
Last Post: marcokrt
  On the [tex]2 \pi i[/tex]-periodic solution to tetration, base e JmsNxn 0 3,508 09/28/2021, 05:44 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  A different approach to the base-change method JmsNxn 0 3,877 03/17/2021, 11:15 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Complex Tetration, to base exp(1/e) Ember Edison 7 23,319 08/14/2019, 09:15 AM
Last Post: sheldonison
  b^b^x with base 0<b<e^-e have three real fixpoints Gottfried 1 9,398 11/07/2017, 11:06 AM
Last Post: sheldonison
Question Analytic matrices and the base units Xorter 2 10,337 07/19/2017, 10:34 AM
Last Post: Xorter



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)