changing terminology (was: overview paper co-author invitation)
#41
(08/13/2009, 11:20 AM)bo198214 Wrote: So then the terms super-exponential, super-logarithm and superfunction would still be in effect (?).

Yes. I think so. Just because there are systematic names the superfunctions and their inverses, doesn't mean existing terms stop being used. The term "superlogarithm" and exponential-logarithm are synonyms now (I also support "tetralogarithm" but have been using "superlogarithm" to distinguish from the 4th polylogarithm). Also, take ethylene for example, its systematic name is "ethene" but no respectable chemist uses the systematic name.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: changing terminology (was: overview paper co-author invitation) - by andydude - 08/13/2009, 07:53 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Not about tetration but what do you think about this paper? Ansus 4 6,674 04/12/2025, 07:32 AM
Last Post: Ansus
  An old paper I did, I think deserves its own thread JmsNxn 4 7,083 12/30/2022, 11:39 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Sat March 6th second Tetration mtg; Peter Walker's 1991 paper sheldonison 13 23,919 03/07/2021, 08:30 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  The second iteration of my most recent paper JmsNxn 3 7,581 02/07/2021, 11:11 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Are there any reputable sources verifying terminology? Chenjesu 0 5,428 08/09/2018, 08:20 PM
Last Post: Chenjesu
  Old Research Paper andydude 3 13,580 01/24/2018, 04:12 AM
Last Post: andydude
  Poll: revised super terminology poll Base-Acid Tetration 8 29,174 08/23/2009, 12:26 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  overview paper co-author invitation bo198214 20 81,582 08/12/2009, 07:00 PM
Last Post: bo198214
  fractional powers of function inversion (was: changing terminology) Base-Acid Tetration 5 23,111 08/11/2009, 01:26 PM
Last Post: bo198214
  Paper with iteration intro andydude 4 18,171 05/13/2009, 07:53 AM
Last Post: andydude



Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)