A specific value of the Ackermann function
#13
Interesting, and that one will certainly grow extremely quickly (is this the idea btw?).

What I like about the Friedman sequence though (and I don't think it's related to yours) is that it's "innocent"; i.e. it's not obvious from the way it's derived how fast the values increase. Since the first two values are 3 and 11, it comes as some surprise that the next value requires several pages worth of "Knuth arrows" to write down (it did to me anyway). Good luck with the journal article.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
large numbers - by bo198214 - 10/19/2008, 11:56 AM
RE: large numbers - by Finitist - 10/26/2008, 06:49 PM
RE: A specific value of the Ackermann function - by Finitist - 11/02/2008, 02:47 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  [Question for Bo] about formal Ackermann laws MphLee 6 10,465 12/18/2022, 09:14 AM
Last Post: MphLee
  Is successor function analytic? Daniel 6 10,177 11/28/2022, 12:03 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Ackermann fixed points Daniel 0 4,220 09/18/2022, 03:13 PM
Last Post: Daniel
  Proof Ackermann function extended to reals cannot be commutative/associative JmsNxn 1 9,626 06/15/2013, 08:02 PM
Last Post: MphLee
  generalizing the problem of fractional analytic Ackermann functions JmsNxn 17 66,566 11/24/2011, 01:18 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Proof Ackermann function cannot have an analytic identity function JmsNxn 0 6,867 11/11/2011, 02:26 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  extension of the Ackermann function to operators less than addition JmsNxn 2 12,796 11/06/2011, 08:06 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Ackermann function and hyper operations andydude 3 18,538 04/18/2011, 05:08 PM
Last Post: bo198214



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)