A specific value of the Ackermann function
#9
bo198214 Wrote:
martin Wrote:Oy. This amount in dollars would sure help the world out of its financial crisis.Smile

Unfortunately there can never be so many dollars, because the number is bigger than the number of atoms in the universe.

An amusing comparison. True, but amusing.

By the way, I wonder how Arthur Eddington came up with 15747724136275002575605653961181555468044717914527116709366231425076185631031296 as the number of protons in the universe.
At least close to 10^80 he was.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
large numbers - by bo198214 - 10/19/2008, 11:56 AM
RE: large numbers - by Finitist - 10/26/2008, 06:49 PM
RE: A specific value of the Ackermann function - by martin - 10/21/2008, 08:13 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  [Question for Bo] about formal Ackermann laws MphLee 6 9,861 12/18/2022, 09:14 AM
Last Post: MphLee
  Is successor function analytic? Daniel 6 9,637 11/28/2022, 12:03 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Ackermann fixed points Daniel 0 4,005 09/18/2022, 03:13 PM
Last Post: Daniel
  Proof Ackermann function extended to reals cannot be commutative/associative JmsNxn 1 9,309 06/15/2013, 08:02 PM
Last Post: MphLee
  generalizing the problem of fractional analytic Ackermann functions JmsNxn 17 65,091 11/24/2011, 01:18 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Proof Ackermann function cannot have an analytic identity function JmsNxn 0 6,720 11/11/2011, 02:26 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  extension of the Ackermann function to operators less than addition JmsNxn 2 12,414 11/06/2011, 08:06 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Ackermann function and hyper operations andydude 3 18,065 04/18/2011, 05:08 PM
Last Post: bo198214



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)