A specific value of the Ackermann function
#8
martin Wrote:Oy. This amount in dollars would sure help the world out of its financial crisis.Smile

Unfortunately there can never be so many dollars, because the number is bigger than the number of atoms in the universe. Already the number \( 2^{65536} \) which I gave in my initial post, which is much much much much (its really not expressable how incredibly much) smaller than the number tetrator was seeking is around \( 10^{19728} \), while the number of atoms in the universe (see wikipedia) is around \( 10^{80} \).
Reply


Messages In This Thread
large numbers - by bo198214 - 10/19/2008, 11:56 AM
RE: large numbers - by Finitist - 10/26/2008, 06:49 PM
RE: A specific value of the Ackermann function - by bo198214 - 10/21/2008, 07:14 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  [Question for Bo] about formal Ackermann laws MphLee 6 11,192 12/18/2022, 09:14 AM
Last Post: MphLee
  Is successor function analytic? Daniel 6 10,816 11/28/2022, 12:03 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Ackermann fixed points Daniel 0 4,544 09/18/2022, 03:13 PM
Last Post: Daniel
  Proof Ackermann function extended to reals cannot be commutative/associative JmsNxn 1 9,888 06/15/2013, 08:02 PM
Last Post: MphLee
  generalizing the problem of fractional analytic Ackermann functions JmsNxn 17 68,275 11/24/2011, 01:18 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Proof Ackermann function cannot have an analytic identity function JmsNxn 0 7,032 11/11/2011, 02:26 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  extension of the Ackermann function to operators less than addition JmsNxn 2 13,144 11/06/2011, 08:06 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Ackermann function and hyper operations andydude 3 19,038 04/18/2011, 05:08 PM
Last Post: bo198214



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)