superexponential below -2
#10
Colleagues, I see you widely use Mathematica. I have few suggestions.
1. type ";" after the Plot[...] operator; this saves one cm at the screen of the reafer.
2. Use colors (as bo198214 does), add argument ,PlotStyle->{RGBColor[0,0,0],RGBColor[1,0,0],...} ; then it is easier to see, where is the real part, where is the imaginary one.
3. Use ImplicitPlot function; then you can plot functions (for example, its real and imaginary parts) the complex plane, and by-pass the singularities which are usually at the real axix. Also, the cuts and branchpoints become seen.
4. Use copylefted C++ function conto, it plots contours better than Mathematica, but you need some programming; see the code and the example at
http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/AnalyticT...t2u00/code
Reply


Messages In This Thread
superexponential below -2 - by bo198214 - 05/10/2008, 09:31 AM
RE: superexponential below -2 - by andydude - 05/13/2008, 08:37 AM
RE: superexponential below -2 - by Ivars - 05/13/2008, 08:00 PM
RE: superexponential below -2 - by andydude - 05/14/2008, 01:37 AM
RE: superexponential below -2 - by Ivars - 05/15/2008, 06:45 AM
RE: superexponential below -2 - by bo198214 - 05/15/2008, 11:33 AM
RE: superexponential below -2 - by Ivars - 05/26/2008, 12:37 PM
RE: superexponential below -2 - by GFR - 05/26/2008, 07:54 PM
RE: superexponential below -2 - by Kouznetsov - 05/27/2008, 12:32 AM
RE: superexponential below -2 - by GFR - 05/27/2008, 01:09 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Growth of superexponential Balarka Sen 7 26,689 03/06/2013, 11:55 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Nowhere analytic superexponential convergence sheldonison 14 52,254 02/10/2011, 07:22 AM
Last Post: sheldonison
  The upper superexponential bo198214 18 59,413 09/18/2009, 04:01 PM
Last Post: Gottfried



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)