Tetration Forum › Tetration and Related Topics › Mathematical and General Discussion v
superexponential below -2

Linear Mode
superexponential below -2
Ivars Offline
Long Time Fellow
****
Posts: 366
Threads: 26
Joined: Oct 2007
#8
05/26/2008, 12:37 PM (This post was last modified: 05/26/2008, 12:39 PM by Ivars.)
Hi GFR

Nice to have You back. Would that mean a possibility of general extension of x^x to negative x even with finite iterations ? Then there could be also a possibility to define any a^x with a<0 as complex number. Some Web complex number calculators do it anyway.

Ivars
Find
Reply


Messages In This Thread
superexponential below -2 - by bo198214 - 05/10/2008, 09:31 AM
RE: superexponential below -2 - by andydude - 05/13/2008, 08:37 AM
RE: superexponential below -2 - by Ivars - 05/13/2008, 08:00 PM
RE: superexponential below -2 - by andydude - 05/14/2008, 01:37 AM
RE: superexponential below -2 - by Ivars - 05/15/2008, 06:45 AM
RE: superexponential below -2 - by bo198214 - 05/15/2008, 11:33 AM
RE: superexponential below -2 - by Ivars - 05/26/2008, 12:37 PM
RE: superexponential below -2 - by GFR - 05/26/2008, 07:54 PM
RE: superexponential below -2 - by Kouznetsov - 05/27/2008, 12:32 AM
RE: superexponential below -2 - by GFR - 05/27/2008, 01:09 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Growth of superexponential Balarka Sen 7 26,689 03/06/2013, 11:55 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Nowhere analytic superexponential convergence sheldonison 14 52,254 02/10/2011, 07:22 AM
Last Post: sheldonison
  The upper superexponential bo198214 18 59,413 09/18/2009, 04:01 PM
Last Post: Gottfried



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)