superexponential below -2
#4
Ivars Wrote:I have no idea why there should be any relation, it is just intuitive impression from nice graphs which Henryk mysteriosly obtained.

It isn't really mysterious. Do you know the graph of a tetrational function, like the ones on my website and on Wikipedia?

Those are plots of \( f(x) = {}^{x}b \) for \( x>-1 \) (and b=e), but
these are plots of \( f(x) = {}^{x}b \) for \( x<-1 \) (and \( b=\sqrt{2} \)).

The difference is that these pictures are complex plots, which means one is the real-part and one is the imaginary-part, which is why he posted 2 plots instead of 1.

Andrew Robbins
Reply


Messages In This Thread
superexponential below -2 - by bo198214 - 05/10/2008, 09:31 AM
RE: superexponential below -2 - by andydude - 05/13/2008, 08:37 AM
RE: superexponential below -2 - by Ivars - 05/13/2008, 08:00 PM
RE: superexponential below -2 - by andydude - 05/14/2008, 01:37 AM
RE: superexponential below -2 - by Ivars - 05/15/2008, 06:45 AM
RE: superexponential below -2 - by bo198214 - 05/15/2008, 11:33 AM
RE: superexponential below -2 - by Ivars - 05/26/2008, 12:37 PM
RE: superexponential below -2 - by GFR - 05/26/2008, 07:54 PM
RE: superexponential below -2 - by Kouznetsov - 05/27/2008, 12:32 AM
RE: superexponential below -2 - by GFR - 05/27/2008, 01:09 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Growth of superexponential Balarka Sen 7 28,201 03/06/2013, 11:55 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Nowhere analytic superexponential convergence sheldonison 14 55,188 02/10/2011, 07:22 AM
Last Post: sheldonison
  The upper superexponential bo198214 18 62,337 09/18/2009, 04:01 PM
Last Post: Gottfried



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)