05/03/2008, 02:18 PM
GFR Wrote:In my opinion, the first sequence (the Ackermann Sequence, proposed by Prof. Scott Aaronson, MIT) is more compatible with the subject that we are studying.
Indeed I wondered whether there are different definitions of Ackermann numbers out there.
Quote:It always goes without saying that the "Ackermann Function" is a function of two variables (attention please: not a two-valued function, because they are strictly forbiddenin this Forum), noted as:
A(0, n) = n+1
A(m, 0) = A(m-1, 1)
A(m, n) = A(m-1, A(m, n-1)).
But be careful, this is what novadays is called Ackermann function. Its main purpose is a simplification of the original Ackermann function - which was indeed a 3 argument function and starting with addition as 0th operation - for proving that there are recursive functions that are not primitive recursive. You can read about the original Ackermann function, i.e. the function that Ackermann defined himself, in his article [1].
[1] Wilhelm Ackermann (192
. "Zum Hilbertschen Aufbau der reellen Zahlen". Mathematische Annalen 99: 118–133.Quote:Unfortunately, due to other personal and family priorities, from to-day I am obliged to give much lesser time to these important and intersting subjects.
It was nice to discuss with you.
Hope we see you again here soon!

in this Forum), noted as: