The (forgotten) left hyper operations
#1
When one starts considering tetration then one usually has the choice between chosing
\( x[4](n+1)=x^{x[4]n} \) or \( x[4'](n+1)=(x[4]n)^x \).

Usually people always prefer the first right bracketed law, because the left bracketed law is too simple:

\( x[4']n=x^{x^{n-1}} \), assuming \( x[4']1=x \).

However as I described here it is more appropriate to assume \( x[4']0=x \) getting the even more simple

\( x[4']n=x^{x^n} \).

Though this is a trivial start, it does not remain trivial when considering left pentation:

\( b[5']0=b \)
\( b[5'](n+1)=(b[5']n)[4']b=(b[5']n)^{(b[5']n)^b} \)

For example \( x[5']1=x^{x^x} \), \( x[5']2= \left( {x}^{{x}^{x}} \right) ^{ \left( {x}^{{x}^{x}} \right) ^{x}}=x^{x^x x^{xx^x}}=x^{x^{x+x^{x+1}} \)

So there is no reason to neglect the left hyper operation sequence by being too trivial! But before proceding something about extension of the left tetration to the reals.

There is one quite obvious way for an extension:
We can describe it by \( b[4']n= f^{\circ n}(b) \) where \( f(x)=x^b \). Then we even have the desired \( b[4']0=f^{\circ 0}(b)=b \).

Now \( x^b \) has the fixed point 1 and this is the only analytic fixed point there. So of course we consider regular iteration at this fixed point which indeed yields \( f^{\circ t}(x)=x^{b^t} \) (without proof) so \( b[4']t=b^{b^t} \).

We do similar for left pentation, let \( f(x)=x^{x^b} \) then \( b[5']n=f^{\circ n}(b) \). Now \( f(x) \) has again a fixed point at 1 and we can apply regular iteration there.

Generally:
\( b[k+1']t={f_k}^{\circ t}(b) \) where \( f_k(x)=x[k']b \).

We can show by induction that \( f_k(1)=1 \) for \( k\ge 3 \) and that \( f_k'(1)=1 \) for \( k\ge 4 \). To obtain real values we maybe must assume that \( b\ge 1 \) and \( f_k(x) \) defined only on \( x\ge 1 \) for \( k\ge 4 \). I think it also can be shown that 1 is the only real fixed point of \( f_k \), \( k\ge 4 \).

So the situation here is quite similar to the one of balanced tetration.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
The (forgotten) left hyper operations - by bo198214 - 04/26/2008, 08:27 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  How could we define negative hyper operators? Shanghai46 2 6,665 11/27/2022, 05:46 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
Question Base Pi Hyper-Operations Catullus 3 7,639 11/08/2022, 06:51 AM
Last Post: Catullus
Question Hyper-Operational Salad Numbers Catullus 9 15,074 09/17/2022, 01:15 AM
Last Post: Catullus
Question Rank-Wise Approximations of Hyper-Operations Catullus 48 73,350 09/08/2022, 02:52 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
Question Octonion Hyper-Operations Catullus 3 6,762 07/05/2022, 08:53 AM
Last Post: Catullus
  Thoughts on hyper-operations of rational but non-integer orders? VSO 4 14,051 06/30/2022, 11:41 PM
Last Post: MphLee
Question Weak Hyper-Operational Etas and Euler Numbers Catullus 0 3,127 06/17/2022, 09:45 AM
Last Post: Catullus
  On my old fractional calculus approach to hyper-operations JmsNxn 14 27,090 07/07/2021, 07:35 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  hyper 0 dantheman163 2 11,395 03/09/2021, 10:28 PM
Last Post: MphLee
  On to C^\infty--and attempts at C^\infty hyper-operations JmsNxn 11 23,194 03/02/2021, 09:55 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)