Hi -
just read your very interesting article. However, I have one remark.
In Eq. 1.3) you define
\( \hspace{24} \exp_a^z(t)= \exp_a(\exp_a^{^{z-1}}(t)) \)
But for the case z->inf we never have a starting condition.
Such a starting condition would be allowed by the alternative definition
\( \hspace{24} \exp_a^z(t)=\exp_a^{^{z-1}}(\exp_a(t)) \)
So I think, it is better to define it this way.
)
just read your very interesting article. However, I have one remark.
In Eq. 1.3) you define
\( \hspace{24} \exp_a^z(t)= \exp_a(\exp_a^{^{z-1}}(t)) \)
But for the case z->inf we never have a starting condition.
Such a starting condition would be allowed by the alternative definition
\( \hspace{24} \exp_a^z(t)=\exp_a^{^{z-1}}(\exp_a(t)) \)
So I think, it is better to define it this way.
Quote:P.S. Henryk Trappmann had invited me here. I hope, his message(I don't think, it was a trap, man
was not a trap.
)
Gottfried Helms, Kassel