Two types of tetration : sexp ' > or < 1.
#2
(10/11/2023, 10:58 PM)leon Wrote: The iterates tan(expression + P) and all others that stack variables into functionless categories are a good example that proves both methods are better than the iterates that don't have like umpteen sums in the formulas.Analytic tetration would be missing all of the steps and procedures if more fundamental tetration. And sexp is like Schroeder-Cauchy inversion and inflection more than it operates on P or reconciles the inequality without composite function logic or super function strings. 

This makes analytically tetrating a bicomposite derivative bigger than two TRI-composites and derivatives a convergent and divergent enough approach to integrate variables more than sums of decomposed functions or super functions, and can give three riemanns sums per derivative that are bigger than another three or two that make the hyper-infinite derivation and functioning possible or not (like a simultaneous hyper-operator

So if this was a good technique what would you say about it vs the newest pentations and higher order hyperoperations? And the lower? Using two at the same time can beat some higher order that could diverge or differ more than derivative functions and methods

About the other variable, the derivatives add up and make two magic rieman sums that are bigger than 2 more derivative ones. (  So how does tetrating or hyperooerating so fast you could be doing two hyperoperations at the same time (but aren't) show two Riemannian sums that differ enough from 2 others? So, one hyo with a bico <bicomposite> or two tricos or one quadco (quadcomoosite) or two of these at the same time? In/outside an anything? Anymore more derivative than x gets Cauchy for gaussian bucks and super function bicos

Can cauchys and riemanns that make xs that can operate on it octocomposite function use two riemmans or two super functions to operate or hyperoperate on two tricos one tricos or one bico where everything isn't derivative from two bigger riemanns?

The way to say this is if a function and it's antiderivatives can Cauchy a bigger function it can make a riemanns sum that beats two tricos.

See the two Riemann sums bigger than the other two in and out of everything more derivative than x  A Schroeder equation is a backwards Cauchy on big enough things so check the ariemann sums like a quadco or to bicos and it will beat the trico like a Schroeder equation too Riemann sums bigger than the other two in and out of everything more derivative than x

euh what ?

regards

tommy1729
Reply


Messages In This Thread

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
Question When Does \(\displaystyle\int_{-1}^0\text{sexp}(x)\,\mathrm{d}x\) Equal \(\frac12\)? Catullus 0 3,319 10/31/2022, 11:47 PM
Last Post: Catullus
  What are the types of complex iteration and tetration? Daniel 5 9,936 08/17/2022, 02:40 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Revitalizing an old idea : estimated fake sexp'(x) = F3(x) tommy1729 0 3,458 02/27/2022, 10:17 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Sexp redefined ? Exp^[a]( - 00 ). + question ( TPID 19 ??) tommy1729 0 6,474 09/06/2016, 04:23 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Can sexp(z) be periodic ?? tommy1729 2 14,693 01/14/2015, 01:19 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  pseudo2periodic sexp. tommy1729 0 6,308 06/27/2014, 10:45 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  [2014] tommy's theorem sexp ' (z) =/= 0 ? tommy1729 1 10,164 06/17/2014, 01:25 PM
Last Post: sheldonison
  Multiple exp^[1/2](z) by same sexp ? tommy1729 12 47,065 05/06/2014, 10:55 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  entire function close to sexp ?? tommy1729 8 32,216 04/30/2014, 03:49 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Is sexp(z) pseudounivalent for Re(z) > 0 ? tommy1729 3 12,850 03/26/2014, 01:24 PM
Last Post: tommy1729



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)