Divergent Series and Analytical Continuation (LONG post)
#31
ALRIGHT!

I FINALLY FUCKING HAVE IT!

THIS IS THE MOST BAFFLING FUCKING FUNCTION MAN!

I AM HERE TO REDEEM MYSELF!

I AM GOING TO GO VERY SLOW!



Let \(f(x)\) be known as Caleb's function; it is written as:

\[
f(x) = \sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{x^n}{1+x^n} \frac{1}{2^n}\\
\]

The theorem we are going to present; is that for \( k \ge 1\) the value:

\[
F_k = \frac{1}{2\pi i} \int_{|z| = 2} f(z)\frac{dz}{z^{k+1}}\,dz = 0\\
\]

And that \(F_0 = 3/2\).

I have confirmed this with pari-gp; and am finally confident enough to answer this stupid annoying ass question, lmao.

We additionally, get a more complex formula for \(k \le -1\).

We start by showing that:

\[
a_{kn} = \frac{1}{2\pi i} \int_{|z| = 2} \frac{z^n}{1+z^n}\frac{dz}{z^{k+1}} = 0\\
\]

For \(k \ge 1\).

This value just equals:

\[
b_{kn} + \frac{1}{n}\sum_{q^n = -1} q^{-k}\\
\]

If \(n \not | k\) then this value is just zero. This is because \(b_{kn}\) is zero. And because the sum on the right is zero.

If \(n | k\) then something unbelievable happens; then \(k = nm\) and:

\[
(-1)^{m+1} + (-1)^m = 0\\
\]

Like holy fuck, how did I miss this.

The only time this doesn't happen is when \(k=0\), upon which the sum on the right is \(1\), and \(b_{kn} = 0\). So we end up with:

\[
F_0 = f(0) + \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1}{2^n} = 3/2\\
\]

And for \(F_k\) we just get:

\[
F_k = \sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{a_{kn}}{2^n} = 0\\
\]

This means that:

\[
B(x) = \frac{1}{2\pi i} \int_{|z| =2} f(z) \frac{dz}{z-x} = \frac{3}{2}\\
\]

Which is exactly as you saw Caleb.



When \(k \le -1\) we basically get the exact same thing. Except the term \(b_{kn} = 0\). So there's no cancellation and we get:

\[
F_k = -\frac{f^{(-k)}(0)}{(-k)!}\\
\]


Okay for fucks SAKES MAN!!!

I'm taking a break now. Been yelling at pari for the past 2 hours, lmao!!!!!

The cool formula I actually wanted is that:

\[
2-f(x) = \sum_{k\in \mathbb{Z}} F_k x^{-k}\\
\]

We should also be able to generalize this. Assume that \(\sum_{n=0}^\infty |a_n| < \infty\); then if:

\[
G(x) = \sum_{n=0}^\infty a_n \frac{x^n}{1+x^n}\\
\]

Then:

\[
F^G_k = \frac{1}{2\pi i} \int_{|z| = 2} G(z) \frac{dz}{z^{k+1}}\\
\]

We have

\[
F^G_0 = \frac{1}{2}a_0+ \sum_{n=1}^\infty a_n\\
\]

And

\[
F^G_k = 0\,\,\text{for}\,\,k \ge 1\\
\]

And for \(k \le -1\); we have:

\[
F^G_k = - \frac{G^{(-k)}(0)}{(-k)!}\\
\]

So that the general formula is for \(|x| > 1\):

\[
C-G(1/x) = \sum_{k\in \mathbb{Z}} F^G_k x^k\\
\]

where \(C\) is an easy constant.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Divergent Series and Analytical Continuation (LONG post) - by JmsNxn - 03/02/2023, 05:13 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Pictures of some generalized analytical continuations Caleb 18 19,337 03/17/2023, 12:56 AM
Last Post: tommy1729
  double functional equation , continuum sum and analytic continuation tommy1729 6 9,811 03/05/2023, 12:36 AM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Discussion on "tetra-eta-series" (2007) in MO Gottfried 40 42,098 02/22/2023, 08:58 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  continuation of fix A to fix B ? tommy1729 22 23,580 02/06/2023, 11:59 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
Question Tetration Asymptotic Series Catullus 18 22,717 07/05/2022, 01:29 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
Question Formula for the Taylor Series for Tetration Catullus 8 13,886 06/12/2022, 07:32 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Calculating the residues of \(\beta\); Laurent series; and Mittag-Leffler JmsNxn 0 3,769 10/29/2021, 11:44 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Trying to find a fast converging series of normalization constants; plus a recap JmsNxn 0 3,610 10/26/2021, 02:12 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Reducing beta tetration to an asymptotic series, and a pull back JmsNxn 2 6,944 07/22/2021, 03:37 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Hey, Everyone; been a long time... JmsNxn 17 28,161 01/28/2021, 09:53 AM
Last Post: MphLee



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)