Understanding \(f(z,\theta) = e^{e^{i\theta}z} - 1\)
#9
So, let's write:

\[
f_\theta^{\circ s}(z) = h^{\circ \frac{s}{q} + \frac{2 \pi s}{q^2\theta}}\\
\]

This can be writ, as:

\[
f_\theta^{\circ -s}(z) = \frac{1}{\Gamma(s)} \int_0^\infty \vartheta[h](x,z) x^{\frac{s}{q} + \frac{2 \pi s}{q^2\theta} -1}\,dx\\
\]

Let \(u = x^{\frac{1}{q} + \frac{2 \pi}{q^2\theta}}\) where by \(du = \left(\frac{1}{q} + \frac{2 \pi}{q^2\theta}\right)x^{\frac{1}{q} + \frac{2 \pi}{q^2\theta}-1}\,dx\). Whereby we now have the equation:

\[
f_\theta^{\circ -s}(z) = \frac{1}{(\frac{1}{q} + \frac{2 \pi}{q^2\theta})\Gamma(s)}\int_0^\infty \vartheta[h](u^{q + \frac{q^2}{2\pi\theta}},z) u^{s-1}\,du\\
\]

Thereby, we can write:

\[
H(x,z) = \frac{1}{\frac{1}{q} + \frac{2 \pi}{q^2\theta}}\sum_{k=0}^\infty f_\theta^{\circ kq}(z) \frac{(-1)^kx^{(q + \frac{q^2}{2\pi\theta})k}}{k!}\\
\]

And we should be able to derive that:

\[
\frac{d^s}{dx^s}\Big{|}_{x=0} H(x,z) = f_\theta^{\circ s}(z)\\
\]

.......... Provided I didn't screw up my elementary calculus.... We may have to take this integral along the arc \([0, \lim_{x\to\infty}x^{1/\theta}]\), rather than just along the real line....

God, I haven't had to keep track of this many variable substitutions since like 2nd or 3rd year undergrad. Getting frustrated.... Tongue   Either way, it's something like this, lol.


Oddly enough; the value:

\[
\frac{1}{\frac{1}{q} + \frac{2 \pi}{q^2\theta}} \approx \frac{1}{m}\\
\]

where \(m\to\infty\) as \(q \to \infty\). But additionally:

\[
f_\theta^{\circ kq} \frac{(-1)^kx^{(q + \frac{q^2}{2\pi\theta})k}}{k!} \approx f_\theta^{kq} \frac{(-1)^k x^{kq}}{k!}\\
\]

So that:

\[
\frac{1}{m} \sum_{k=0}^\infty f_\theta^{kq/m} \frac{(-1)^k x^{kq/m}}{k!} \approx \int_0^\infty f^{\circ kq}(z) \frac{e^{\pi i k}x^{kq}}{k!}\,dk\\
\]

I smell a fourier transform somewhere in here. Too tired tn, but I think we can solve for when \(q \to \infty\) using integral calculus. Which would allow us to talk about the neutral case... when \(\Im\theta \to 0\) and \(q = \infty\)...

Recalling that all the work of this post, only works for the set \(\theta \in 2 \pi \mathbb{Q}(i) \cap \Im(\theta) > 0\), and nowhere else. We have to take limits to get it to work for \(\Im(\theta) \ge 0\) for arbitrary functions.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Understanding \(f(z,\theta) = e^{e^{i\theta}z} - 1\) - by JmsNxn - 01/03/2023, 04:35 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  iterating z + theta(z) ? [2022] tommy1729 5 5,645 07/04/2022, 11:37 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  [split] Understanding Kneser Riemann method andydude 7 24,667 01/13/2016, 10:58 PM
Last Post: sheldonison
  theta and the Riemann mapping sheldonison 2 12,972 10/11/2011, 12:49 PM
Last Post: sheldonison
  Understanding Abel/Schroeder with matrix-expression Gottfried 12 33,620 05/26/2008, 08:45 PM
Last Post: Gottfried



Users browsing this thread: 30 Guest(s)