Consider the function f(x,y) being a mapping from R^2 to R^2 such that
f(x,y) = ( taylor1(x,y) , taylor2(x,y) )
where taylor1 and taylor 2 do not satisfy the cauchy riemann equations , hence f(x,y) is not isomorphic to an analytic function f(z) with real x and im y.
f^[2](x,y) = ( taylor1(f(x,y)) , taylor2(f(x,y)) ) = ( taylor1( taylor1(x,y),taylor2(x,y) ) , taylor2( taylor1(x,y),taylor2(x,y) ) )
and in general for t >= 0
f^[0](x,y) = (x,y)
f^[t](x,y) = ( taylor1( f^[t-1](x,y) ) , taylor2( f^[t-1](x,y) ) )
(with some abuse notation sorry )
How about fractals and superfunctions for these f(x,y) ?
Maybe take taylors to be real polynomials to start.
many analogues must exist to ideas from complex dynamics.
Leo considered a rotation.
fixpoints might occur.
but also saddle points.
inversion might be troublesome : e.g. x^2 + y^2 = 1 has uncountable solutions.
In particular consider the case from a region A to region B by f(x,y) such that the mapping is injective.
btw i use taylor to avoid piecewise functions ( even c^oo can be piecewise ! ) which imo is too general.
So basically dynamics of mappings on a plane that are injective but not holomorphic or antiholomorphic.
it relates to dynamics , chaos and differential equations ofcourse.
but i want to know what you think and know.
the semi-group property is slightly desired
regards
tommy1729
f(x,y) = ( taylor1(x,y) , taylor2(x,y) )
where taylor1 and taylor 2 do not satisfy the cauchy riemann equations , hence f(x,y) is not isomorphic to an analytic function f(z) with real x and im y.
f^[2](x,y) = ( taylor1(f(x,y)) , taylor2(f(x,y)) ) = ( taylor1( taylor1(x,y),taylor2(x,y) ) , taylor2( taylor1(x,y),taylor2(x,y) ) )
and in general for t >= 0
f^[0](x,y) = (x,y)
f^[t](x,y) = ( taylor1( f^[t-1](x,y) ) , taylor2( f^[t-1](x,y) ) )
(with some abuse notation sorry )
How about fractals and superfunctions for these f(x,y) ?
Maybe take taylors to be real polynomials to start.
many analogues must exist to ideas from complex dynamics.
Leo considered a rotation.
fixpoints might occur.
but also saddle points.
inversion might be troublesome : e.g. x^2 + y^2 = 1 has uncountable solutions.
In particular consider the case from a region A to region B by f(x,y) such that the mapping is injective.
btw i use taylor to avoid piecewise functions ( even c^oo can be piecewise ! ) which imo is too general.
So basically dynamics of mappings on a plane that are injective but not holomorphic or antiholomorphic.
it relates to dynamics , chaos and differential equations ofcourse.
but i want to know what you think and know.
the semi-group property is slightly desired
regards
tommy1729