07/14/2022, 04:57 AM
@Daniel
Now I am really baffled. I never expected such a reaction when asking someone to make himself familiar with proofs; in resemblance to RTFM (read the fucking manual), to indicate that it is a tedious enterprise but in the end one would be rewarded with answers to the problem one has.
@James
Right, the naming was misleading, in my memory it was from Milnor. However in reality it was in an article by Shishikura. I excerpted stuff from this article in our Wiki https://math.eretrandre.org/hyperops_wik...oordinates
The keyword is "perturbed Fatou coordinates". Also I found interesting presentations in that direction under the keyword "parabolic Implosion" on the web.
Now I am really baffled. I never expected such a reaction when asking someone to make himself familiar with proofs; in resemblance to RTFM (read the fucking manual), to indicate that it is a tedious enterprise but in the end one would be rewarded with answers to the problem one has.
@James
Right, the naming was misleading, in my memory it was from Milnor. However in reality it was in an article by Shishikura. I excerpted stuff from this article in our Wiki https://math.eretrandre.org/hyperops_wik...oordinates
The keyword is "perturbed Fatou coordinates". Also I found interesting presentations in that direction under the keyword "parabolic Implosion" on the web.