Rank-Wise Approximations of Hyper-Operations
#1
Question 
When [Image: png.image?\dpi%7B110%7D%20a\uparrow\uparrow%20x] converges and a does not equal one, you could possibly extend tetration at base a by using the limit formula here.
Then you could possibly use the same limit formula to extend pentation, hexation et cetera at base a.
Does anyone know of any approximations of these hyper-operations that become more and more accurate as the ranks of the hyper-operations increase?
Please remember to stay hydrated.
ฅ(ミ⚈ ﻌ ⚈ミ)ฅ Sincerely: Catullus /ᐠ_ ꞈ _ᐟ\
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Rank-Wise Approximations of Hyper-Operations - by Catullus - 06/04/2022, 01:55 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  How could we define negative hyper operators? Shanghai46 2 7,880 11/27/2022, 05:46 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
Question Base Pi Hyper-Operations Catullus 3 9,110 11/08/2022, 06:51 AM
Last Post: Catullus
Question Hyper-Operational Salad Numbers Catullus 9 17,584 09/17/2022, 01:15 AM
Last Post: Catullus
Question Octonion Hyper-Operations Catullus 3 7,860 07/05/2022, 08:53 AM
Last Post: Catullus
  Thoughts on hyper-operations of rational but non-integer orders? VSO 4 16,249 06/30/2022, 11:41 PM
Last Post: MphLee
Question Weak Hyper-Operational Etas and Euler Numbers Catullus 0 3,595 06/17/2022, 09:45 AM
Last Post: Catullus
  On my old fractional calculus approach to hyper-operations JmsNxn 14 30,893 07/07/2021, 07:35 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  hyper 0 dantheman163 2 12,410 03/09/2021, 10:28 PM
Last Post: MphLee
  On to C^\infty--and attempts at C^\infty hyper-operations JmsNxn 11 26,064 03/02/2021, 09:55 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Could there be an "arctic geometry" by raising the rank of all operations? Syzithryx 2 11,421 07/24/2019, 05:59 PM
Last Post: Syzithryx



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)