+- Tetration Forum (https://tetrationforum.org)
+-- Forum: Tetration and Related Topics (https://tetrationforum.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Mathematical and General Discussion (https://tetrationforum.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Thread: Poll: revised super terminology poll (/showthread.php?tid=332)
Poll: revised super terminology poll - Base-Acid Tetration - 08/13/2009
in response to complaint(s) of bias, i removed the previous poll.
The difference is that anti-iter f is not replaced by itra f.
Pick the one that you think is the best. If you don't care about this issue, PLEASE don't vote - it isn't like a public policy issue, so please don't muddle the opinions of those to whom it matters the most.
RE: Poll: revised super terminology poll - Base-Acid Tetration - 08/16/2009
I will leave the polls up for two weeks a week a day a minute. After that I will just by fiat declare the majority to be the "right" terms... heh heh heh, the irony of democracy...
RE: Poll: revised super terminology poll - Base-Acid Tetration - 08/19/2009
BE IT RESOLVED, that the function of x, f^r(x), the f-power; its inverse the f-root; the function of r, f^r(x) the f-exponential; its inverse the f-logarithm.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the “hyper-operations” be called the way described in the second (2nd) post of the thread "Poll: hyper-operations terminology" in Tetration Forum.
SIGNED, (sign by posting a signature thread)
Screw all that formalism, just call them f-exponential, f-logarithm, and the superexponentail be called the tetra-exponential, etc.
RE: Poll: revised super terminology poll - bo198214 - 08/20/2009
But I think to relativize one should also mention that there are only 4 participants in this poll!
RE: Poll: revised super terminology poll - Base-Acid Tetration - 08/20/2009
No one seemed to care, that's why I just pretended to declare the right terminology, to see if anyone missed his chance and really wants it.
RE: Poll: revised super terminology poll - Base-Acid Tetration - 08/22/2009
Urhh...someone would care... and he is me...
RE: Poll: revised super terminology poll - tommy1729 - 08/22/2009
(08/20/2009, 12:04 PM)bo198214 Wrote: But I think to relativize one should also mention that there are only 4 participants in this poll!
i have to remark : at least 5.
to get to the point :
can you plz explain to me , WHY i cant vote ?
i tried 3 times.
i did not complaints about the forum in the past , but voting is not allowed for me ?
tommy1729
RE: Poll: revised super terminology poll - bo198214 - 08/23/2009
What exactly doesnt work?
Were you logged in?
RE: Poll: revised super terminology poll - tommy1729 - 08/23/2009
(08/23/2009, 09:50 AM)bo198214 Wrote: What exactly doesnt work?
Were you logged in?
of course i was logged in.
only members can vote.
some members that is ...