Tetration Forum
Infinite products - Printable Version

+- Tetration Forum (https://tetrationforum.org)
+-- Forum: Tetration and Related Topics (https://tetrationforum.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Mathematical and General Discussion (https://tetrationforum.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Thread: Infinite products (/showthread.php?tid=267)



Infinite products - andydude - 04/06/2009

I just remembered a method I tried like 5 years ago, but haven't visited in a while.

Now that we have better power series expansions of tetration, for example, at \( x=(-1) \) we have
\(
\text{tet}(x) = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty}c_k(x+1)^k
\)
and using the definition, we can rewrite this as
\(
\begin{array}{rl}
\text{tet}(x)
& = \exp\left(\text{tet}(x-1)\right) \\
& = \exp\left(\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}c_kx^k\right) \\
& = \prod_{k=0}^{\infty} \exp(c_k{x^k}) \\
& = \prod_{k=0}^{\infty} a_k^{x^k} \\
\end{array}
\)
where \( a_k = e^{c_k} \)

I wonder if this simplifies the coefficients or just makes things more complicated?

Andrew Robbins


RE: Infinite products - tommy1729 - 04/06/2009

andydude Wrote:I just remembered a method I tried like 5 years ago, but haven't visited in a while.

Now that we have better power series expansions of tetration, for example, at \( x=(-1) \) we have
\(
\text{tet}(x) = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty}c_k(x+1)^k
\)
and using the definition, we can rewrite this as
\(
\begin{array}{rl}
\text{tet}(x)
& = \exp\left(\text{tet}(x-1)\right) \\
& = \exp\left(\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}c_kx^k\right) \\
& = \prod_{k=0}^{\infty} \exp(c_k{x^k}) \\
& = \prod_{k=0}^{\infty} a_k^{x^k} \\
\end{array}
\)
where \( a_k = e^{c_k} \)

I wonder if this simplifies the coefficients or just makes things more complicated?

Andrew Robbins

that could have been my own post Smile

i wondered about it too.


RE: Infinite products - bo198214 - 04/06/2009

andydude Wrote:
\(
\begin{array}{rl}
\text{tet}(x) =
\dots & = \prod_{k=0}^{\infty} a_k^{x^k} \\
\end{array}
\)
where \( a_k = e^{c_k} \)

I wonder if this simplifies the coefficients or just makes things more complicated?

To calculate the coefficients you either need on both sides a product or on both sides a sum. So I dont see how the product representation can be useful.