![]() |
|
How about ... F(x)^[3] + 2 F(x)^[2] = exp(x) ? - Printable Version +- Tetration Forum (https://tetrationforum.org) +-- Forum: Tetration and Related Topics (https://tetrationforum.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Mathematical and General Discussion (https://tetrationforum.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Thread: How about ... F(x)^[3] + 2 F(x)^[2] = exp(x) ? (/showthread.php?tid=1069) |
How about ... F(x)^[3] + 2 F(x)^[2] = exp(x) ? - tommy1729 - 03/06/2016 How about ... F(x)^[3] + 2 F(x)^[2] = exp(x) ? I have no idea how to do this. This bugs me. Its a simple equation. Regards Tommy1729 RE: How about ... F(x)^[3] + 2 F(x)^[2] = exp(x) ? - tommy1729 - 03/07/2016 It seems logical to consider F_{n+1}(x) = ( 1/2 ( exp(x) - f_{n}^[3](x) ) )^[1/2]. The limit of the iteration is then the solution. But how about convergeance and analyticity ? Regards Tommy1729 RE: How about ... F(x)^[3] + 2 F(x)^[2] = exp(x) ? - tommy1729 - 03/07/2016 Maybe start the iteration with exp^[1/3](x). Regards Tommy1729 RE: How about ... F(x)^[3] + 2 F(x)^[2] = exp(x) ? - tommy1729 - 11/10/2021 (03/07/2016, 11:07 AM)tommy1729 Wrote: It seems logical to consider F_{n+1}(x) = ( 1/2 ( exp(x) - f_{n}^[3](x) ) )^[1/2]. I see no reason why this would fail , assuming a good starting function and starting point x. This should be investigated imo. regards tommy1729 Tom Marcel Raes |