![]() |
|
[Regular tetration] [Iteration series] norming fixpoint-dependencies - Printable Version +- Tetration Forum (https://tetrationforum.org) +-- Forum: Tetration and Related Topics (https://tetrationforum.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Mathematical and General Discussion (https://tetrationforum.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Thread: [Regular tetration] [Iteration series] norming fixpoint-dependencies (/showthread.php?tid=483) Pages:
1
2
|
RE: [Regular tetration] norming fixpoint-dependencies - Gottfried - 08/31/2010 (08/30/2010, 11:14 PM)tommy1729 Wrote: i.e. z<> z^z => z^z =/= (z + z^^2)/2. I explained in an earlier post my misuse of the z^^h-notation. (Oh, that was in the other thread only?, Then - sorry) Ok. To make ascii-writing short I use it there (and now here) in that meaning: using a base b, z^^h is b^b^...^b^z where h is the number of b, in case of continuous: z^^h = \( \exp_b^{oh}(z) \) I think that "misuse" can be justified since we usually talk about a fixed chosen base ("b") and discuss the change of parameter z as iteration start, h as iteration "height" and z^^h as iteration result. Reading some "z^z" above I think there is a misunderstanding there. Gottfried RE: [Regular tetration] norming fixpoint-dependencies - tommy1729 - 08/31/2010 i will explain later ... ( edit ) i started a new thread in the general section related to (mainly) this and my ' f(x) = f(x^2) blunder thread ' |