+- Tetration Forum (https://tetrationforum.org)
+-- Forum: Tetration and Related Topics (https://tetrationforum.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Computation (https://tetrationforum.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Thread: Kneser-iteration on n-periodic-points (base say \sqrt(2)) (/showthread.php?tid=1277)
Pages:
1
2
RE: Kneser-iteration on n-periodic-points (base say \sqrt(2)) - JmsNxn - 05/05/2021
Hey, Gottfried
I answered your question on Math Stackexchange. At least, I think I have. Hope it explains something.
EDIT:
Yes, I definitely understand what you mean now, and I'm 1000% sure I answered your question on Mathoverflow. If anything, I just haven't explained myself fluently. But on that question I see more fluently what you are asking. No, this doesn't create any type of paradox or unresolved result. It's just a question of HOW you define the iteration.
RE: Kneser-iteration on n-periodic-points (base say \sqrt(2)) - Gottfried - 05/05/2021
(05/05/2021, 02:27 AM)JmsNxn Wrote: Hey, Gottfried
I answered your question on Math Stackexchange. At least, I think I have. Hope it explains something.
EDIT:
Yes, I definitely understand what you mean now, and I'm 1000% sure I answered your question on Mathoverflow. If anything, I just haven't explained myself fluently. But on that question I see more fluently what you are asking. No, this doesn't create any type of paradox or unresolved result. It's just a question of HOW you define the iteration.
James - very nice, thanks you. I need time to chew on your exposition, but surely I'll be happy if I find something which restores the picture.
Courious, whether now some more input shall follow in mathoverflow; I'll rewrite my article of concern when I've fully understood your argument - possibly needs a day or two...
Kind regards -
Gottfried